|
1
|
- Jacquline Stanley, LPN
- Problem Investigator, Senior Associate
- Six Sigma Project Lead
- American Red Cross
|
|
2
|
- Benefits of an Organizational Culture change
- Impact of NOT having an Organizational Culture change
- Definition of Problem
- What is a Problem?
- Common managerial approach to problems
- Definition of Problem Solving
- 2 ways to solve problems
- Paradigm Paralysis
- Paradigm Shifts
- Paradigm Exercise (groups/organizations)
- Common Cause Variation vs. Special Cause Variation (examples)
- Problem Solving Methodologies
- Easy Problem Solving Steps/Tools (any methodology)
- Problem Statements
- Scoping out the problem
- Process Mapping and Baseline Data
- Tribal knowledge vs. Raw Data (hypothesis testing)
- Developing solutions to the problem statement
- Implementing Improvements (pilot vs. full scale)
- Control Plans
- WIP Exercise
- Questions ???
|
|
3
|
- An organization with a culture built around a systematic problem solving
approach will be able to…
- Dramatically improve quality, reduce waste, reduce cycle time, and speed
up innovation
- Achieve competitive advantage through significant cost reduction and
customer satisfaction
- Set the standard in innovation, quality, and service
- Solve persistent, recurring problems permanently
|
|
4
|
- Recurring problems, in spite of efforts to suppress them.
- Decreased morale and commitment because of the frustration of dealing
with recurring problems.
- Significant resources poured into implementing solutions without being
clear about what the problem really is.
- “Band-aiding” problems without getting to root cause
- Choosing the “tried and true” approaches that usually achieve minimal
improvements, instead of achieving breakthrough results through
innovative solutions.
|
|
5
|
- 1. A question to be considered, solved, or answered
- 2. A situation, matter, or person that presents perplexity or difficulty
- 3. A misgiving, objection, or complaint
|
|
6
|
- A problem is an opportunity for improvement.
- A problem is the difference between your current state and your goal
state.
- A problem results from the recognition of a present imperfect and the
belief in the possibility of a better future. (Challenges can lead to
problems…)
|
|
7
|
- Managers Tend to Deal with Problems in One of Three Ways:
- Avoid them - refuse to recognize that a problem exists
- Solve them as necessary - deal with the urgent (reactive)
- Seek them out - anticipate and face now in order to avoid urgencies
(proactive)
- Objective: Make the third our usual approach to problems
|
|
8
|
- The act of defining a problem; determining the cause of the problem;
identifying, prioritizing and selecting alternatives for a solution; and
implementing a solution.
|
|
9
|
- Systematic Problem Solvers:
- They prefer a logical and rational approach to problems. They reach for
a narrow and focused problem,
step by step processes, rules that must be followed, and computer
programs that grind to a recommendation. (MiniTab statistical software)
- Intuitive Problem Solvers:
- They are more comfortable with solutions that just "come to"
them. Compared with systematic problem solvers, intuitive thinkers find:
data less important, complexity less bothersome, continuous change
expected, and being more or less right is less scary than being
precisely wrong.
- Note: Both systematic and intuitive problem solvers can be successful
managers
|
|
10
|
- Definition: A paradigm is the strongly held beliefs and assumptions that
we all use to "filter" incoming information.
- It does not necessarily describe reality, but it does describe a certain
aspect of it.
- Paradigm paralysis is failure to change our beliefs and assumptions when
new information shows us a change is needed.
- Example: A lady had a tumor
removed from her brain. The part of the brain removed affected her
ability to taste. However, she continued to taste food. This was because
she used ‘old data’ to provide this sensation. This is the power of
expectations!
|
|
11
|
- One simple question can cause a ‘paradigm shift’… “There has to be a
better way!”
- Put a ‘fresh’ set of eyes on the problem… maybe a new employee or
someone new to the process!?!
- Put someone that knows the current paradigm but isn’t smitten by it.
- The outcome… a ‘new’ paradigm.
- Innovation comes to life!
|
|
12
|
- Step 1. Select an industry or organization with which you have extensive
experience. (form groups)
- Step 2. List three paradigms from this industry or organization. (5
minutes)
- Step 3. For each one of these old paradigms, list a new paradigm that
could replace it. (5 minutes)
- Step 4. Each group select one person to present the Paradigms
- Reminder: A paradigm is a strongly held belief or assumption we use to
"filter" incoming information. A paradigm is the eyeglasses
through which a manager "sees" problems and potential
solutions to these problems.
|
|
13
|
- Common-cause variation characteristics:
- Phenomena constantly active within the system;
- Variation predictable probabilistically;
- Irregular variation within an historical experience base; and
- Lack of significance in individual high or low values.
- The outcomes of a roulette wheel are a good example of common-cause
variation. Common-cause variation is the noise within the system.
- Note: Walter A. Shewhart
originally used the term chance-cause. The term common-cause was coined
by Harry Alpert in 1947. Shewhart called a process that features only
common-cause variation as being in statistical control. This term is
deprecated by some modern statisticians who prefer the phrase stable and
predictable.
- Special-cause variation characteristics:
- New, unanticipated, emergent or previously neglected phenomena within
the system;
- Variation inherently unpredictable, even probabilistically;
- Variation outside the historical experience base; and
- Evidence of some inherent change in the system or our knowledge of it.
- Special-cause variation always arrives as a surprise. It is the signal
within a system.
- Note: Walter A. Shewhart
originally used the term assignable-cause. The term special-cause was
coined by W. Edwards Deming.
|
|
14
|
- Common Cause variation is created by many factors, that are commonly
part of the process, and are acting totally at random and independent of
each other. Their origin can usually be traced to the key elements of
the system in which the process operates.
- Materials
- Equipment
- People
- Environment
- Methods
- If only common causes of variation are present, the output of a process
forms a distribution that is stable over time. Common cause variation
represents approximately 80-85 percent of all variation.
- Special Cause variation is created by a non-random event leading to an
unexpected change in the process output. The effects are intermittent
and unpredictable. They are referred to as “Assignable” causes.
- Operator error
- Broken tools
- Machine settings drift
- If Special Causes of variation are present, the process output is not
stable over time and is not predictable. All processes must be brought
into statistical control by first detecting and removing the Special
Cause variation.
|
|
15
|
- Six Sigma
- Lean (eliminating waste)
- Lean Six Sigma (eliminating waste/process improvement)
- Deming Cycle of PDCA (Plan, Do, Check, Act)
- Deming Cycle of PDSA (Plan, Do, Study, Act)
- Joiner 7-step method
|
|
16
|
- Steps:
- 1. Define the project goals and customer (internal and external)
deliverables.
- 2. Measure the process to determine current performance; quantify the
problem.
- 3. Analyze and determine the root cause(s) of the defects.
- 4. Improve the process by eliminating defects and or waste.
- 5. Control future process performance.
- Tools:
- 1. Charter, SHA, SIPOC, VOC, AD, CTQ trees
- 2. Prioritization Matrix, Cycle efficiencies, Time Value analysis,
Pareto charts, Run charts, FMEA. Gauge R&R, VOP, Benchmarking
- 3. 5 Why’s, C&E Matrix, Brainstorming, AD, Fishbone, Control
Charts, Flow diagrams, Pareto charts, Regression analysis, Scatter
Plots, Histograms, Hypothesis tests
- 4. Brainstorming, Flow charting, FMEA, SHA, 5 S’s (Lean- sort,
straighten, shine, standardize, sustain), Kaizen (focus/grow people),
DOE
- 5. Control Charts, Flow diagrams, Pareto Charts (before/after), Control
Plan (what if action plan)
|
|
17
|
- A key element of any project charter is the problem statement. The
problem statement is a clear and concise statement that describes the
symptoms of the problem to be addressed.
- Benefits of a problem statement:
- creates a sense of ownership for the team
- focuses the team on an accepted problem
- describes the symptoms in measurable terms
|
|
18
|
- Define the problem - In the problem statement, team members define the
problem in specific terms. They present facts such as the product type
and the error made.
- Identify where the problem is appearing - Identifying where the problem
is appearing, or manifesting, as specifically as possible helps the team
focus its improvement efforts.
- Describe the size of the problem - The size of the problem is described
in measurable terms.
- Describe the impact the problem is having on the organization - The
description of the problem's impact on the organization should be as
specific as possible.
|
|
19
|
- The problem statement should not address more than one problem.
- The problem statement should not assign a cause.
- The problem statement should not assign blame.
- The problem statement should not offer a solution.
- Note: The more specific the
statement is the better the chance that the main problem will be
addressed.
|
|
20
|
- Fifteen percent of the “Lazy-Dayz” system updates we applied last month
had to be back out. This has caused a 25% increase in service desk
issues.
- World hunger continues to rise. This has caused more and more children
to die.
- There has been an 8% rise in RBC discards this year. This has caused
BloodBankers-R-US to lose 10% of their customers.
|
|
21
|
- What to keep in mind when scoping out the problem
- Time and Cost are not determined in the scoping, they are the outcome of
the scoping process.
- When defining the scope, we are talking about developing a common
understanding as to what is included and/or excluded from the project.
- If the project scope is TOO large you may not have enough time or
resources to complete the project within the budget.
- If the project scope is TOO small you may fail to meet the Process
Owner’s needs and miss the project goal.
|
|
22
|
- Step 1: Determine the Boundaries
- Step 2: List the Steps
- Step 3: Sequence the Steps
- Step 4: Draw Appropriate Symbols
- Start with the basic symbols:
- Ovals show input to start the process or output at the end of the
process.
- Boxes or rectangles show task or activity performed in the process.
- Arrows show process direction flow.
- Diamonds show points in the process where a yes/no questions are asked
or a decision is required.
- Usually there is only one arrow out of an activity box. If there is
more than one arrow, you may need a decision diamond.
- If there are feedback arrows, make sure feedback loop is closed; i.e.
it should take you back to the input box.
- Step 5: Check for Completeness
- Step 7: Finalize the Flowchart
|
|
23
|
- Baseline data is basic information gathered before a program/process
change begins. It is used later to provide a comparison for assessing
program/process change impact.
- If the goals and objectives are vaguely defined or undefined, you will
find it difficult to know what kind of baseline data to gather. (refer
to problem statement)
|
|
24
|
- Tribal knowledge is any unwritten information that is known within a
group but often unknown outside of it.
- This term is used most when referencing information that may need to be
known by others in order to produce quality product or service. The
information may be key to quality performance but it may also be totally
incorrect. Unlike similar forms of artisan intelligence, tribal
knowledge can be converted into company property. It is often a good
source of test factors during improvement efforts.
- Collecting ‘Raw Data’
- Can be captured in the past, present, or future.
- In a very broad sense, ‘raw data’ can be numbers, characters, images, or
other outputs from an observers observation.
- This disorganized measurable ‘data’ eventually becomes organized
‘information’ through data sorting and analysis.
- The ‘information’ can be translated into scientific and/or practical
conclusions.
|
|
25
|
- Must address the problem statement
- Must be within the projects budget and time constraint
- Must be well organized before executed
- Must have the teams ‘buy in’
- Must be sold to the Process Owner (and have their buy-in)
- Must be carried out by the Process Owner and the team
- Must be followed by the Process Owner for future hand-off.
|
|
26
|
- Pilot: Small scale improvement plan over a short period of time. Often
used for large projects and to prove the ‘new’ process will work system
wide.
- Full scale: All improvements are made over a short period of time. Can
be used for both large and small projects. Requires much more effort and
resources. All or nothing implementation process. If doing a DOE, this
could be expensive if the improvement fails and the team needs to go
back to the drawing board.
|
|
27
|
- The intent of a process control plan is to control the product
characteristics and the associated process variables to ensure
capability (around the identified target) and stability of the product
over time.
- The process Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is a document to
identify the risks associated with something potentially going wrong
(creating a defect - out of specification) in the production of the
product. The FMEA identifies what controls are placed in the production
process to catch any defects at various stages on the processing.
- Note: Every completed project
should have not only a control chart (if applicable), but a control
plan. This ensures that the process doesn't revert to the way it
previously operated.
|
|
28
|
- Acronym for Work in Progress/Process
- Unfinished product of a process
and or many sub processes that has value added from labor or any other
additional processing.
- PLAY CARDS…
|
|
29
|
|